India, Nukes and Neighbors (Also post #1)
A good friend suggested that instead of sending emails with links and commenting on them, I should instead start blogging for the benefit of mankind and all.
If nothing else, this would presumably save the otherwise innocent bandwidth.
Anyway as a first topic, I decided to take up something slightly controversial - India, with its nukes and the precarious situation it is in with its neighbors. As a catalyst, here is a recent editorial in IHT which largely echoes my thoughts.
The basic problem is India has China on one side, Pakistan on the other. Both have nukes.
The question is - should India have gone nuke in the first place knowing that someday it'll be surrounded by nuke-toting countries?
While the pseudo-official line is that India went nuke because of China, surely someone should have thought of the ramifications - it ain't pretty surrounded by nucular countries.
Is this a case of a country applying a greedy heuristic at the given time (going nuclear in the 70s), only to be left in a local minima decades later (now).
Perhaps a dynamic programming approach might have been more fruitful..
If nothing else, this would presumably save the otherwise innocent bandwidth.
Anyway as a first topic, I decided to take up something slightly controversial - India, with its nukes and the precarious situation it is in with its neighbors. As a catalyst, here is a recent editorial in IHT which largely echoes my thoughts.
The basic problem is India has China on one side, Pakistan on the other. Both have nukes.
The question is - should India have gone nuke in the first place knowing that someday it'll be surrounded by nuke-toting countries?
While the pseudo-official line is that India went nuke because of China, surely someone should have thought of the ramifications - it ain't pretty surrounded by nucular
Is this a case of a country applying a greedy heuristic at the given time (going nuclear in the 70s), only to be left in a local minima decades later (now).
Perhaps a dynamic programming approach might have been more fruitful..
either you are drunk or i'm too mentally exhausted to make sense of your mayan spiel. The only thing I can conclude about the world ending in 2012, is I better get laid more often.
So I agree that hindsight is always 20/20. And I agree that tensions will always persist. But just because there are tensions doesn't mean one goes nuke.
Look at Greece and Turkey - they have a much longer and bloodier history than India and any of its' neighbors.
I also fail to see the point of comparing ourselves with fascist regimes like Iran and NK.
If anything you are undermining your own argument by pointing out that these countries are either terrorist camps or commie/fascist regimes.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Deception-
Pakistan-Nuclear-Weapons-Conspiracy
/dp/1843545330
This is a very well researched book and pays a lot of attention to even the minutest of detail.The focus is on Pakistan and how it subverted every rule in the book to go nuclear,how and from where it procured components for its Kahuta enrichment facility, and how America looked the other way every single time.
Worth a read.
-Harjot